feat: implement plugin architecture and application settings with Svelte UI
- Added plugin base and loader for backend extensibility - Implemented application settings management with config persistence - Created Svelte-based frontend with Dashboard and Settings pages - Added API routes for plugins, tasks, and settings - Updated documentation and specifications - Improved project structure and developer tools
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,68 +1,50 @@
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
SYNC IMPACT REPORT
|
||||
Version: 1.1.0 (Svelte Support)
|
||||
Changes:
|
||||
- Added Svelte Component semantic markup standards.
|
||||
- Updated File Structure Standards to include `.svelte` files.
|
||||
- Refined File Structure Standards to distinguish between Python Modules and Svelte Components.
|
||||
Templates Status:
|
||||
- .specify/templates/plan-template.md: ⚠ Pending (Needs update to include Component headers in checks).
|
||||
- .specify/templates/spec-template.md: ✅ Aligned.
|
||||
- .specify/templates/tasks-template.md: ⚠ Pending (Needs update to include Component definition tasks).
|
||||
-->
|
||||
# Semantic Code Generation Constitution
|
||||
# [PROJECT_NAME] Constitution
|
||||
<!-- Example: Spec Constitution, TaskFlow Constitution, etc. -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Core Principles
|
||||
|
||||
### I. Causal Validity (Contracts First)
|
||||
Semantic definitions (Contracts) must ALWAYS precede implementation code. Logic is downstream of definition. We define the structure and constraints (`[DEF]`, `@PRE`, `@POST`) before writing the executable logic. This ensures that the "what" and "why" govern the "how".
|
||||
### [PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]
|
||||
<!-- Example: I. Library-First -->
|
||||
[PRINCIPLE_1_DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
<!-- Example: Every feature starts as a standalone library; Libraries must be self-contained, independently testable, documented; Clear purpose required - no organizational-only libraries -->
|
||||
|
||||
### II. Immutability of Architecture
|
||||
Once defined, architectural decisions in the Module Header (`@LAYER`, `@INVARIANT`, `@CONSTRAINT`) are treated as immutable constraints for that module. Changes to these require an explicit refactoring step, not ad-hoc modification during implementation.
|
||||
### [PRINCIPLE_2_NAME]
|
||||
<!-- Example: II. CLI Interface -->
|
||||
[PRINCIPLE_2_DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
<!-- Example: Every library exposes functionality via CLI; Text in/out protocol: stdin/args → stdout, errors → stderr; Support JSON + human-readable formats -->
|
||||
|
||||
### III. Semantic Format Compliance
|
||||
All output must strictly follow the `[DEF]` / `[/DEF]` anchor syntax with specific Metadata Tags (`@KEY`) and Graph Relations (`@RELATION`). This structure is non-negotiable as it ensures the codebase remains machine-readable, fractal-structured, and optimized for Sparse Attention navigation by AI agents.
|
||||
### [PRINCIPLE_3_NAME]
|
||||
<!-- Example: III. Test-First (NON-NEGOTIABLE) -->
|
||||
[PRINCIPLE_3_DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
<!-- Example: TDD mandatory: Tests written → User approved → Tests fail → Then implement; Red-Green-Refactor cycle strictly enforced -->
|
||||
|
||||
### IV. Design by Contract (DbC)
|
||||
Contracts are the Source of Truth. Functions and Classes must define their purpose, specifications, and constraints (`@PRE`, `@POST`, `@THROW`) in the metadata block before implementation. Implementation must strictly satisfy these contracts.
|
||||
### [PRINCIPLE_4_NAME]
|
||||
<!-- Example: IV. Integration Testing -->
|
||||
[PRINCIPLE_4_DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
<!-- Example: Focus areas requiring integration tests: New library contract tests, Contract changes, Inter-service communication, Shared schemas -->
|
||||
|
||||
### V. Belief State Logging
|
||||
Logs must define the agent's internal state for debugging and coherence checks. We use a strict format: `logger.level(f"[{ANCHOR_ID}][{STATE}] {MESSAGE} context={...}")` to track transitions between `Entry`, `Validation`, `Action`, and `Coherence` states.
|
||||
### [PRINCIPLE_5_NAME]
|
||||
<!-- Example: V. Observability, VI. Versioning & Breaking Changes, VII. Simplicity -->
|
||||
[PRINCIPLE_5_DESCRIPTION]
|
||||
<!-- Example: Text I/O ensures debuggability; Structured logging required; Or: MAJOR.MINOR.BUILD format; Or: Start simple, YAGNI principles -->
|
||||
|
||||
## File Structure Standards
|
||||
## [SECTION_2_NAME]
|
||||
<!-- Example: Additional Constraints, Security Requirements, Performance Standards, etc. -->
|
||||
|
||||
### Python Modules
|
||||
Every `.py` file must start with a Module definition header (`[DEF:module_name:Module]`) containing:
|
||||
- `@SEMANTICS`: Keywords for vector search.
|
||||
- `@PURPOSE`: Primary responsibility of the module.
|
||||
- `@LAYER`: Architecture layer (Domain/Infra/UI).
|
||||
- `@RELATION`: Dependencies.
|
||||
- `@INVARIANT` & `@CONSTRAINT`: Immutable rules.
|
||||
- `@PUBLIC_API`: Exported symbols.
|
||||
[SECTION_2_CONTENT]
|
||||
<!-- Example: Technology stack requirements, compliance standards, deployment policies, etc. -->
|
||||
|
||||
### Svelte Components
|
||||
Every `.svelte` file must start with a Component definition header (`[DEF:ComponentName:Component]`) wrapped in an HTML comment `<!-- ... -->` containing:
|
||||
- `@SEMANTICS`: Keywords for vector search.
|
||||
- `@PURPOSE`: Primary responsibility of the component.
|
||||
- `@LAYER`: Architecture layer (UI/State/Layout).
|
||||
- `@RELATION`: Child components, Stores used, API calls.
|
||||
- `@PROPS`: Input properties.
|
||||
- `@EVENTS`: Emitted events.
|
||||
- `@INVARIANT`: Immutable UI/State rules.
|
||||
## [SECTION_3_NAME]
|
||||
<!-- Example: Development Workflow, Review Process, Quality Gates, etc. -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Generation Workflow
|
||||
The development process follows a strict sequence:
|
||||
1. **Analyze Request**: Identify target module and graph position.
|
||||
2. **Define Structure**: Generate `[DEF]` anchors and Contracts FIRST.
|
||||
3. **Implement Logic**: Write code satisfying Contracts.
|
||||
4. **Validate**: If logic conflicts with Contract -> Stop -> Report Error.
|
||||
[SECTION_3_CONTENT]
|
||||
<!-- Example: Code review requirements, testing gates, deployment approval process, etc. -->
|
||||
|
||||
## Governance
|
||||
This Constitution establishes the "Semantic Code Generation Protocol" as the supreme law of this repository.
|
||||
<!-- Example: Constitution supersedes all other practices; Amendments require documentation, approval, migration plan -->
|
||||
|
||||
- **Automated Enforcement**: All code generation tools and agents must parse and validate adherence to the `[DEF]` syntax and Contract requirements.
|
||||
- **Amendments**: Changes to the syntax or core principles require a formal amendment to this Constitution and a corresponding update to the constitution
|
||||
- **Review**: Code reviews must verify that implementation matches the preceding contracts and that no "naked code" exists outside of semantic anchors.
|
||||
- **Compliance**: Failure to adhere to the `[DEF]` / `[/DEF]` structure constitutes a build failure.
|
||||
[GOVERNANCE_RULES]
|
||||
<!-- Example: All PRs/reviews must verify compliance; Complexity must be justified; Use [GUIDANCE_FILE] for runtime development guidance -->
|
||||
|
||||
**Version**: 1.1.0 | **Ratified**: 2025-12-19 | **Last Amended**: 2025-12-19
|
||||
**Version**: [CONSTITUTION_VERSION] | **Ratified**: [RATIFICATION_DATE] | **Last Amended**: [LAST_AMENDED_DATE]
|
||||
<!-- Example: Version: 2.1.1 | Ratified: 2025-06-13 | Last Amended: 2025-07-16 -->
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user