This commit is contained in:
2026-05-11 22:58:01 +03:00
parent 2abba06e52
commit fefdee98d0
30 changed files with 1681 additions and 1222 deletions

View File

@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
---
description: Execute the Python/Svelte implementation planning workflow and generate research, design, contracts, and quickstart artifacts.
description: Execute the implementation planning workflow for ss-tools (Python backend + Svelte frontend) and generate research, design, contracts, and quickstart artifacts.
handoffs:
- label: Create Tasks
agent: speckit.tasks
prompt: Break the Python/Svelte plan into executable tasks
prompt: Break the plan into executable tasks for Python/Svelte implementation
send: true
- label: Create Checklist
agent: speckit.checklist
prompt: Create a requirements-quality checklist for the active Python/Svelte feature
prompt: Create a requirements-quality checklist for the active feature
---
## User Input
@@ -27,20 +27,20 @@ You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
2. **Load canonical planning context**:
- `README.md`
- `backend/pyproject.toml` and `backend/requirements.txt`
- `frontend/package.json` and `frontend/svelte.config.js`
- `docs/SEMANTIC_PROTOCOL_COMPLIANCE.md`
- `docs/adr/*.md` (Architecture Decision Records)
- `requirements.txt` (backend dependencies)
- `frontend/package.json` (frontend dependencies)
- `.specify/memory/constitution.md`
- `.opencode/skills/semantics-core/SKILL.md`
- `.opencode/skills/semantics-contracts/SKILL.md`
- `.opencode/skills/semantics-python/SKILL.md`
- `.opencode/skills/semantics-svelte/SKILL.md`
- `.opencode/skills/semantics-testing/SKILL.md`
- `.opencode/skills/semantics-frontend/SKILL.md`
- `.specify/templates/plan-template.md`
- relevant `docs/adr/*.md`
3. **Execute the planning workflow** using the template structure:
- Fill `Technical Context` for the current repository reality: Python 3.13+ backend (FastAPI, SQLAlchemy), Svelte 5 frontend (SvelteKit, Vite, Tailwind CSS), PostgreSQL storage, Docker deployment.
- Fill `Constitution Check` using the local constitution, semantic protocol compliance doc, and ADR set.
- Fill `Technical Context` for the current repository reality: Python 3.9+/FastAPI backend, SvelteKit 5/Tailwind frontend, PostgreSQL, Docker, semantic contracts, belief runtime.
- Fill `Constitution Check` using the local constitution.
- ERROR if a blocking constitutional or semantic conflict is discovered and cannot be justified.
- Phase 0: generate `research.md` in `FEATURE_DIR`, resolving all material unknowns.
- Phase 1: generate `data-model.md`, `contracts/modules.md`, optional machine-readable contract artifacts, and `quickstart.md` in `FEATURE_DIR`.
@@ -51,19 +51,17 @@ You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Phase 0: Research
Research must resolve only implementation-shaping unknowns that matter for this Python/Svelte repository, such as:
- backend module placement under `backend/src/` (api/, core/, models/, services/, schemas/)
- frontend component placement under `frontend/src/` (routes/, lib/components/, lib/stores/, lib/api/)
- `backend/tests/` and `frontend/tests/` strategy and required fixture coverage
- FastAPI endpoint / WebSocket schema design
- Svelte 5 runes reactivity model ($state, $derived, $effect, $props)
- PostgreSQL schema and migration strategy
- belief-state runtime coverage for C4/C5 Python flows
Research must resolve only implementation-shaping unknowns that matter for this repository, such as:
- module placement under `backend/src/` or `frontend/src/`
- API endpoint design (REST routes, WebSocket channels)
- database schema changes (SQLAlchemy models, migrations)
- Svelte component hierarchy and store topology
- async task orchestration patterns
- test strategy (pytest + vitest) and required fixture coverage
- belief runtime instrumentation for C4/C5 flows
- semantic validation boundaries and static verification workflow
Write `research.md` with concise sections:
- Decision
- Rationale
- Alternatives Considered
@@ -75,54 +73,47 @@ Use `[NEED_CONTEXT: target]` instead of inventing relation targets, DTO names, o
### UX / Interaction Validation
Validate the proposed design against `ux_reference.md` as an **interaction reference** for:
- API callers (REST endpoints, WebSocket messages)
- CLI/operator flows
- Svelte UI flows (when the feature introduces frontend components)
- Result envelopes, warnings, and recovery guidance
Validate the proposed design against `ux_reference.md` as an **interaction reference** for operators, API callers, CLI/operator flows, result envelopes, warnings, recovery guidance, and (when applicable) browser-based UI flows.
If the planned architecture degrades the promised interaction model, deterministic recovery path, or context-budget behavior, stop and warn the user.
### Data Model Output
Generate `data-model.md` for Python/Svelte domain entities such as:
- FastAPI request/response schemas (Pydantic models)
- SQLAlchemy ORM entities
- Svelte store shapes and component props
- WebSocket message envelopes
- Task/report/artifact entities
Generate `data-model.md` for ss-tools domain entities such as:
- Pydantic request/response schemas
- SQLAlchemy models and relationships
- WebSocket message formats
- Task state transitions
- Git operation entities
- Plugin configuration schemas
- Frontend TypeScript types (when feature is fullstack)
### Global ADR Continuity
Before task decomposition, planning must identify any repo-shaping decisions this feature depends on or extends:
- Python module layout and decomposition (`backend/src/api/`, `backend/src/core/`, etc.)
- Frontend component architecture (Svelte 5 runes, SvelteKit routing)
- Belief-state runtime behavior for C4/C5 flows
- Semantic comment-anchor rules for Python and Svelte
- RBAC/security constraints (local auth, ADFS SSO)
- Plugin system lifecycle
- Python module layout and decomposition
- FastAPI route organization
- SvelteKit routing and component hierarchy
- belief-state runtime behavior (JSON structured logging / console markers)
- semantic comment-anchor rules
- payload/schema stability decisions
For each durable choice, ensure the plan references the relevant ADR and explicitly records accepted and rejected paths.
### Contract Design Output
Generate `contracts/modules.md` as the primary design contract for implementation. Contracts must:
- use short semantic IDs
- classify each planned module/component with `@COMPLEXITY` 1-5
- use canonical relation syntax `@RELATION PREDICATE -> TARGET_ID`
- preserve accepted-path and rejected-path memory via `@RATIONALE` and `@REJECTED` where needed
- describe Python backend modules (api routes, core services, models, plugins) and Svelte frontend components instead of inventing Rust/MCP layers
- use appropriate comment-anchor syntax: `# [DEF:...]` for Python, `<!-- [DEF:...] -->` for Svelte markup, `// [DEF:...]` for Svelte script blocks
- describe Python modules, FastAPI routes, Svelte components, stores, and services instead of inventing MCP/backend layers
Complexity guidance for this repository:
- **Complexity 1**: anchors only (DTOs, simple constants)
- **Complexity 2**: `@PURPOSE` (utility functions, pure helpers)
- **Complexity 3**: `@PURPOSE`, `@RELATION` (multi-step flows with dependencies); Svelte components also `@UX_STATE`
- **Complexity 4**: `@PURPOSE`, `@RELATION`, `@PRE`, `@POST`, `@SIDE_EFFECT`; Python orchestration paths should account for belief runtime markers (`belief_scope`, `reason`, `reflect`, `explore`); Svelte also `@UX_FEEDBACK`, `@UX_RECOVERY`, `@UX_REACTIVITY`
- **Complexity 1**: anchors only (DTOs, simple Pydantic schemas)
- **Complexity 2**: `@PURPOSE` (pure functions, utility helpers)
- **Complexity 3**: `@PURPOSE`, `@RELATION` (service modules, route handlers)
- **Complexity 4**: `@PURPOSE`, `@RELATION`, `@PRE`, `@POST`, `@SIDE_EFFECT`; orchestration paths should account for belief runtime markers before mutation or return
- **Complexity 5**: level 4 plus `@DATA_CONTRACT`, `@INVARIANT`, and explicit decision-memory continuity
If a planned contract depends on unknown schema, relation target, or ADR identity, emit `[NEED_CONTEXT: target]` instead of fabricating placeholders.
@@ -130,19 +121,15 @@ If a planned contract depends on unknown schema, relation target, or ADR identit
### Quickstart Output
Generate `quickstart.md` using real repository verification paths:
- start or exercise the FastAPI backend entrypoint: `cd backend && python -m uvicorn src.app:app --reload`
- start or exercise the SvelteKit frontend: `cd frontend && npm run dev`
- invoke relevant API endpoints or CLI commands
- validate expected response envelopes, WebSocket messages, and recovery flows
- run `cd backend && pytest` for backend tests
- run `cd frontend && npm run test` for frontend tests
- run `ruff check backend/` for Python linting
- Backend: `cd backend && source .venv/bin/activate && python -m pytest -v`
- Frontend: `cd frontend && npm run test`
- Lint: `python -m ruff check backend/src/ backend/tests/`
- Docker: `docker compose up --build`
## Key Rules
- Use absolute paths in workflow execution.
- Planning must reflect the current repository structure (`backend/src/`, `frontend/src/`, `docs/adr/`) rather than legacy Rust/MCP examples.
- Do not reference `.ai/*` or `.kilocode/*` paths as feature artifacts.
- Planning must reflect the current repository structure (`backend/src/**/*.py`, `frontend/src/**/*.svelte`, `backend/tests/`, `docs/adr/*`).
- Do not reference `.ai/*` or `.kilocode/*` paths (use `.opencode/` for skills).
- Do not write any feature planning artifact outside `specs/<feature>/...`.
- Do not hand off to `speckit.tasks` until blocking ADR continuity and rejected-path guardrails are explicit.