Files
ss-tools/specs/028-llm-datasource-supeset/checklists/requirements.md
busya 46d89c9006 docs(028): update all feature documents for enhancement phase completion (US11-US12)
- effort-estimate-report.md: updated metrics (~182 files, ~40K LOC), added enhancement breakdown, updated comparative analysis
- spec.md: status → Core + Enhancement complete, added Enhancement Implementation Notes
- plan.md: all enhancement components marked , metrics updated
- tasks.md: all 26 enhancement tasks (T135-T160) → [x], closure summary updated
- quickstart.md: added §10 Direct Database Insert flow
- data-model.md, research.md, contracts/modules.md, ux_reference.md, spec.ru.md, checklists/requirements.md: dates, statuses, metrics aligned
- all documents now reflect 2026-06-11 state: ~174-182 files, ~39-40K LOC, ~580 pytest, ~68 vitest
2026-06-11 19:11:05 +03:00

80 lines
6.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# Specification Quality Checklist: LLM Table Translation Service
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: 2026-05-08
**Updated**: 2026-06-11 (enhancement: Direct DB Insert + Connection Settings — IMPLEMENTED)
**Feature**: [spec.md](../spec.md)
## Content Quality
- [x] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs) leak into spec.md
- [x] Focused on user value and business needs — translation workflow, dictionary management, scheduling for operational stakeholders
- [x] Written for non-technical stakeholders — uses business terminology throughout
- [x] All mandatory sections completed (User Scenarios, Clarifications, Requirements, Key Entities, Success Criteria, Assumptions, Access Control Matrix)
## UX Consistency
- [x] Functional requirements fully support all flows in ux_reference.md (Flows AG, updated for Superset API execution)
- [x] Error handling requirements match all 'Error Experience' scenarios (AI) in ux_reference.md
- [x] No requirements contradict the defined User Persona or Context
- [x] UX principles (preview gates manual runs, traceability, graceful degradation, cost awareness) are reflected in functional requirements
- [x] INSERT execution via Superset API is consistent across spec, UX, quickstart, and contracts
## Requirement Completeness
- [x] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain — all post-review ambiguities resolved in Clarifications sessions
- [x] Requirements are testable and unambiguous — each FR describes a specific, verifiable behavior
- [x] Success criteria are measurable — 15 SC items include specific percentages, time bounds, or coverage targets
- [x] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [x] All acceptance scenarios are defined — 7 user stories with 41 total acceptance scenarios
- [x] Edge cases are identified — 19 core edge cases + 14 multi-language/correction + 3 direct DB (connection failure, deletion blocked, password changed) = 36 edge cases covering NULL values, missing tables, large datasets, concurrency, LLM failures, composite keys, dictionary duplicates, schedule overlaps, retention gap, Superset API errors, SQL injection, direct DB connection/auth/timeout failures
- [x] Scope is clearly bounded — covers configuration, preview quality gate, execution via Superset API OR direct DB, history, dictionary management, feedback loop, scheduling, connection settings; dialect-aware SQL generation (PostgreSQL/Greenplum, ClickHouse)
- [x] Dependencies and assumptions identified — 22 assumptions
## Feature Readiness
- [x] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria (mapped to user story acceptance scenarios)
- [x] User scenarios cover primary flows: Configuration (P1) → Preview Quality Gate + Dictionary (P2) → Superset API Execution + Feedback + Scheduling (P3) → Audit (P4)
- [x] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [x] No implementation details leak into specification
- [x] Feature aligns with existing ss-tools architecture patterns (plugin system, Superset integration, LLM provider, scheduler, notification, RBAC)
- [x] Contradictions resolved: FR-023 (snapshot isolation), dictionary conflict model (overwrite/keep existing), preview model (quality gate), auto-insert for scheduled runs (after first successful manual run)
- [x] New entities added: TranslationBatch, TranslationPreviewSession, TranslationPreviewRecord, MetricSnapshot
- [x] Event model expanded: nullable run_id, terminal states (succeeded/partial/failed/cancelled/skipped), pre-run events
- [x] Access control matrix defined with ownership constraints
- [x] Dialect-aware SQL generation declared (PostgreSQL/Greenplum + ClickHouse, detected from Superset connection)
- [x] Retention gap resolved: MetricSnapshot persistence before event pruning
## Implementation Verification (2026-06-10)
| Check | Status |
|-------|--------|
| Backend: translate plugin | ✅ Exists at `plugins/translate/` (59 source files, C2 skeleton) |
| Backend: translate routes | ✅ Exists as `api/routes/translate/` package (13 submodules) |
| Backend: translate services | ✅ Decomposed across 59 plugin source files |
| Backend: translate models | ✅ Exists as `models/translate.py` (401 строка) |
| Backend: translate schemas | ✅ Exists as `schemas/translate.py` (712 строк) |
| Backend: translate tests | ✅ 27 файлов в `plugins/translate/__tests__/` + 12 внешних |
| Frontend: translate pages | ✅ `/translate/`, `/translate/[id]/`, `/translate/dictionaries/`, `/translate/history/` |
| Frontend: translate components | ✅ 14 Svelte компонентов (включая ConfigTabForm, RunTabContent, TargetTabForm, TargetSchemaHint) |
| Frontend: translate API client | ✅ `lib/api/translate/` (8 модулей) |
| Backend: ConnectionService | ✅ Exists as `core/connection_service.py` (448 строк) |
| Backend: DbExecutor | ✅ Exists as `core/db_executor.py` (369 строк) |
| Backend: Connection CRUD endpoints | ✅ +5 endpoints in `routes/settings.py` |
| Frontend: ConnectionsTab | ✅ Exists as `routes/settings/ConnectionsTab.svelte` (385 строк) |
| Frontend: InsertMethodSelector | ✅ Exists as `components/translate/InsertMethodSelector.svelte` (185 строк) |
| Docker compose | ✅ `docker-compose.yml` exists |
| Backend .env | ✅ `backend/.env` (ENCRYPTION_KEY + feature flags) |
## Notes
- Post-review session resolved 3 critical contradictions and 10+ medium gaps.
- FR count: 78 (49 original + 14 multi-language/correction + 15 direct DB/connections) | SC count: 30 | Key entities: 15 | Edge cases: 36
- Preview model clarified as quality gate (not row-level approval for all rows).
- INSERT execution supports two methods: Superset `/api/v1/sqllab/execute/` API (existing) AND direct DB connection (NEW via US11US12).
- Database connection settings moved to common Settings → Connections tab with encryption, test, and dependency safety.
- `connections: list[dict]` stub in `GlobalSettings` promoted to `list[DatabaseConnection]` with Pydantic model validation.
- All manual copy/paste SQL Lab references removed from spec, UX, quickstart, and contracts.
- Spec status: Implemented ✅ (core + enhancement — all 160 tasks complete)
- Актуальные метрики: ~174 файла, ~39 400 строк кода (core + enhancement complete)